1. This white satin
wedding corset, embellished with cream-colored ribbon and lace trim, dates back
to 1885. During this period, upper class women were expected to wear a corset
every day, beginning in childhood. This corset was created especially for a
bride to wear only once—on her wedding day.
This caption addresses Emma’s corset within its contemporary
cultural context. Rather than focusing on the actual garment, the caption gives
visitors a more general picture of the use of corsets at the end of the
nineteenth-century. It allows the visitor to understand that, while women wore
corsets daily for almost their entire lives, this corset was special. It was
designed for a woman to wear on one of the most important days of her life, and
was never worn again. While addressing both the every day practice of wearing
corsets, and why this specific corset is distinctive, it leaves out all of the
specific details known about this particular garment. Because details of Emma
Hendel Spang’s life are known, as well as details of her wedding day, and this
caption neglects to mention them, it is not the strongest of the three choices.
2. This white satin
corset was worn by Emma Hendel on October 22, 1885 during her lavish wedding to
Isaac Spang in Reading, Pennsylvania. When laced, the waist of the corset
measures just nineteen inches around. Judging by the ribbon and lace ornamentation
and extremely high quality of craftsmanship, the corset was likely designed
especially for Emma to wear on her wedding day.
This caption focuses on the physical details of the corset,
but includes some personal details about Emma as well. More than the other
captions, it reflects the description step of my methodology. By mentioning the
measurement of the waist—just nineteen inches—visitors, particularly the female
visitors, will most likely imagine living in a world where wearing a
restricting corset to provide you with a tiny waist was expected. By describing
the high quality of craftsmanship and pointing out the ornamentation, visitors
will spend more time examining the physical details of the corset. Because Emma
and Isaac are also mentioned, as well as some details about their wedding,
visitors will understand the personal sentiment also involved with the corset,
and connect more than if the caption was solely a physical description. This
caption may be the best choice for the exhibit, as it brings in different
aspects of the corset’s life—thought caption number three is my personal
favorite.
3. Emma Hendel wore
this white satin corset beneath a white satin gown, adorned with lace and
diamonds, on October 22, 1885, during her lavish wedding to Isaac Young Spang
at Trinity Lutheran Church in Reading, Pennsylvania. The exquisite quality of
this corset reflected the magnificence of the event, described in the local
newspaper as the most brilliant matrimonial event of the season.
This caption focuses on the people, places, and events that
the corset encountered. It provides a brief description of the dress that Emma
wore over the corset, which will allow visitors to envision the entire outfit,
rather than just the corset. As an undergarment, the intention of the corset
was to provide a woman with a specific body type. The visitors are privileged
to see a very personal garment, which matched the luxury of Emma’s wedding and
entire adult life. This caption provides the most detail about the actual
wedding, which I believe will appeal to modern day visitors. It notes the fine
craftsmanship and relates that to the lavishness of the entire event. By
mentioning a description from the local newspaper, visitors learn how public this
wedding was. This is the caption that will romance visitors the most, and
depending on how it works within the entire exhibit, may be the strongest
caption for our intended purposes.
I'm torn, though I do agree that this is a case where the romance of the specific narrative works quite nicely (and that you're able to put the corset into a very specific costume context, as well as social context). I also like the reference to the single-use in #1: it's a modern sort of expectation (it's close to ten years since I so much as dusted the box my wedding dress is packed in) that contrasts nicely with the subverted expectations of the non-white wedding dresses that will be displayed. And you're right, #2's references to a nineteen inch waist do produce a quite visceral reaction.
ReplyDelete