Mark
M. Smith’s Sensing the Past: Seeing,
Hearing, Smelling, Tasting, and Touching in History offers an important aspect
in the study of material culture by providing a study of the five senses
through history. Smith separates the five senses into five chapters, each
describing the history of that specific sense. Though each chapter is dedicated
to a particular sense, common themes arise in each section, including the
senses’ affect on ideas of class, gender, race, identity, modernization, and
religion. Smith is careful to provide a global history of each sense, including
many examples of how the senses affected these common themes in non-Western
civilizations.
Following
our class discussions, and because of the details offered by The Reading Eagle in describing Emma’s
wedding, I found the theme of class development through the senses appealing.
Even in the sense that seems the most obvious way to identify someone’s
class—vision—Smith provided an interesting take on not so obvious aspects of
seeing, including the affects of installing electric and gas powered
streetlights on various cities around the world. In the newspaper articles I
have found that offer a glimpse of Emma’s wedding, the only day I am positive
the corset was worn, the visual aspects dominated the descriptions. The
authors, however, also included three other senses. By describing the selection
of songs played, and the instrument that played them (the organ), the
delightful aroma coming from the elaborate display of flowers decorating the
alter, and the three-hundred pounds of fruit and several different flavors of
wedding cake, those assigned to describe Emma’s wedding proved the importance
of at least four out of the five senses that day. The sound of various wedding
songs on an organ, smell of flowers, and taste of exotic fruits and cakes, all
help to display Emma’s high position on society. Interestingly though, as a
historian, I experienced these descriptions visually, through the written word.
As Smith described the deep divide between the sounds, smells, and even tastes
between the elite and working classes, I applied his observations through
history to Emma’s own life.
Smith’s specific
discussion about the question of touch within museums interested me. The one
sense I have not been able to experience in any way during my study of Emma’s
corset, is touch. As many material culturists agree, touch is important in
understanding an object and the person or people who have interacted with that
object in the past. To be able to hold, lace, or even try on our objects, would
allow each of us to experience them in a completely new way. Alas, the proper
care and maintenance of these objects is much more important than emotional
experiences, and thus we must continue our relationships with our objects free
from the sense of touch—at least directly.
No comments:
Post a Comment